I’m just making a mirror of the blog post at The Phoenix, because their server is melting at the moment:
“I have written about this before, in various contexts; tonight I’ve checked with several people directly involved in the MassGAP effort who confirm that this history as I’ve just presented it is correct — and that Romney’s claim tonight, that he asked for such a study, is false.
I will write more about this later, but for tonight let me just make a few quick additional points. First of all, according to MassGAP and MWPC, Romney did appoint 14 women out of his first 33 senior-level appointments, which is a reasonably impressive 42 percent. However, as I have reported before, those were almost all to head departments and agencies that he didn’t care about — and in some cases, that he quite specifically wanted to not really do anything. None of the senior positions Romney cared about — budget, business development, etc. — went to women.
Secondly, a UMass-Boston study found that the percentage of senior-level appointed positions held by women actually declined throughout the Romney administration, from 30.0% prior to his taking office, to 29.7% in July 2004, to 27.6% near the end of his term in November 2006. (It then began rapidly rising when Deval Patrick took office.)
Third, note that in Romney’s story as he tells it, this man who had led and consulted for businesses for 25 years didn’t know any qualified women, or know where to find any qualified women. So what does that say?”
- Mitt Romney’s Binder Full of Women Gets Its Own Tumblr Before Debate’s Even Over [That’s So Romney] (jezebel.com)
- Trapper Keep-her? Mitt Romney’s ‘Binder Full of Women’ Gets Meme’d (mashable.com)
- Presidential debate memes: Binders of women, a job for Jeremy (news.cnet.com)
- The New Big Bird: Romney’s Binders Full of Women (projectsocial.net)
Something important to remember. SHARE this post, the link below will tell people who are overseas how to register from abroad. Let’s do our part to make sure as many people register to vote as possible.
via Wall Photos.
the price of political apathy is to be ruled by evil men
- Voting turns into frustrating ordeal for college student (iwatchnews.org)
- Gessler asks 4,000 prove eligibility or get off Colorado voter rolls (denverpost.com)
- Keep Fighting: How to Beat Pennsylvania’s Attempt to Suppress Your Vote (politicususa.com)
- Could tougher voting laws squelch the youth vote? (sfgate.com)
They could turn a too-close-to-call race into a landslide for President Obama— but by definition they probably won’t.
Call them the unlikely voters.
A nationwide USA TODAY/Suffolk University Poll of people who are eligible to vote but aren’t likely to do so finds that these stay-at-home Americans back Obama’s re-election over Republican Mitt Romney by more than 2-1. Two-thirds of them say they are registered to vote. Eight in 10 say the government plays an important role in their lives.
Even so, they cite a range of reasons for declaring they won’t vote or saying the odds are no better than 50-50 that they will: They’re too busy. They aren’t excited about either candidate. Their vote doesn’t really matter. And nothing ever gets done, anyway.